In the design, construction, and maintenance of high-temperature industrial furnaces, the selection of insulating firebrick (IFB) directly affects furnace-wall heat loss, structural steel loads, refractory lining life, and overall operating costs. Selecting the wrong brick—whether because of an insufficient temperature rating, excessive thermal conductivity, or unsuitable mechanical strength—can lead to overheating of the furnace shell, increased energy consumption, or even premature lining failure.
Firebird offers three major insulating firebrick product lines covering classification temperatures from 1260°C to 1760°C. These products support applications ranging from laboratory electric kilns to large industrial furnaces. This guide explains how to select among the three series by comparing their technical properties, forming processes, application areas, and cost-performance characteristics.
ASTM C155 is one of the most widely used international classification standards for insulating firebrick. It classifies IFBs according to the test temperature at which the permanent linear change after reheating does not exceed 2%.
The grade number indicates the approximate temperature in degrees Fahrenheit. For example, Grade 23 corresponds to 2300°F, or approximately 1260°C, while Grade 26 corresponds to 2600°F, or approximately 1430°C.
This classification system is widely recognized and provides a useful basis for international procurement and product comparison.
| ASTM Group | Test Temperature, °F (°C) | Classification Temperature, °C | Maximum Bulk Density, g/cm³ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 2250 (1230) | 1260 | 0.77 |
| 26 | 2550 (1400) | 1430 | 0.86 |
| 28 | 2750 (1510) | 1540 | 0.96 |
| 30 | 2950 (1620) | 1650 | 1.09 |
| 32 | 3150 (1730) | 1760 | 1.52 |
In addition to ASTM standards, ISO 2245:2006 and the Chinese standard GB/T 35845-2018 for mullite insulating firebrick are also widely used.
ISO 2245 uses a “temperature-density” designation. For example, ISO 2245-140-0.8 indicates a classification temperature of 1400°C and a bulk density of 0.8 g/cm³.
Chinese GB designations combine material initials, temperature grade, and density. For example, MG-26 corresponds approximately to ASTM Grade 26.
Although relationships exist among ASTM, ISO, and Chinese GB classifications, their test methods and individual property requirements are not identical. For international procurement, ASTM classifications are commonly used as the primary reference for comparison.
This is one of the most commonly misunderstood points in IFB selection.
Classification temperature is the test temperature at which the brick’s permanent linear change after reheating does not exceed 2%. It is not the temperature at which the brick can necessarily operate continuously over the long term.
Practical selection recommendations:
- Hot-face applications: Select a grade with a classification temperature approximately 200–300°C above the design temperature.
- Backup applications: Calculate the interface temperature based on the lining’s temperature gradient, then select a brick with a classification temperature approximately 100°C above the calculated interface temperature.
For example, if the furnace design temperature is 1200°C and the IFB is used directly on the hot face, ASTM Grade 26, with a classification temperature of 1430°C, should be considered instead of ASTM Grade 23, with a classification temperature of 1260°C. This provides a greater margin for long-term dimensional stability.

Firebird’s three IFB product lines use different forming processes and focus on different performance priorities. Together, they provide a broad density and temperature coverage matrix.
| Comparison Factor | FJM Series | GMK23 Series | EcoFoam RTGC Series |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forming process | Extrusion/cast forming | Foamed-slurry casting | Foam casting with a microporous structure |
| ASTM grades | 23–32 | 23–24 | 23–30 |
| Classification temperature range | 1260–1760°C | 1260–1320°C | 1260–1650°C |
| Bulk density range | 0.5–1.3 g/cm³ | 0.5–0.53 g/cm³ | 0.53–0.95 g/cm³ |
| Thermal conductivity at 400°C | 0.17–0.49 W/m·K | 0.12–0.15 W/m·K | 0.13–0.34 W/m·K |
| Primary advantages | Full temperature coverage, high strength, and a complete grade range | Very low thermal conductivity and environmentally cleaner production without SO₂ emissions | Low density combined with practical strength and quantifiable energy-saving potential |
| Typical applications | Hot-face and backup linings in various industrial furnaces | Electric kilns, laboratory furnaces, and degassing furnaces | Energy-efficiency upgrades, heat-treatment furnaces, and kiln cars |
The following sections explain the technical characteristics and selection logic of each series.
The FJM Series is Firebird’s main general-purpose IFB product line. It is manufactured from pure refractory clay, selected alumina, and graded organic fillers.
The bricks are formed through extrusion or casting, fired at high temperature in a natural-gas tunnel kiln, and precision-ground to achieve accurate dimensions. The series covers the full range from ASTM Grade 23 to Grade 32, making it suitable for a broad range of industrial furnace applications.
The following values are typical properties of standard FJM grades. Thermal conductivity is tested using the ASTM C182 water-flow plate method.
| Grade | ASTM Grade | Classification Temperature, °C | Bulk Density, g/cm³ | Cold Crushing Strength, MPa | Flexural Strength, MPa | PLC, % at °C × 24 h | TC at 400°C, W/m·K | Al₂O₃, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FJM23L | 23 | 1260 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.7 | -0.3 at 1230 | 0.17 | 42 |
| FJM23 | 23 | 1260 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | -0.2 at 1230 | 0.19 | 42 |
| FJM25 | 25 | 1350 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.2 | -0.5 at 1350 | 0.21 | 50 |
| FJM26 | 26 | 1430 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.4 | -0.4 at 1400 | 0.21 | 55 |
| FJM26LS | 26 | 1430 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 1.2 | -0.2 at 1400 | 0.21 | 59 |
| FJM26H | 26 | 1430 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.5 | -0.2 at 1400 | 0.30 | 55 |
| FJM28 | 28 | 1540 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.5 | -0.8 at 1510 | 0.30 | 65 |
| FJM30 | 30 | 1600 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.8 | -0.8 at 1600 | 0.40 | 72 |
| FJM32 | 32 | 1650 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 2.5 | -0.7 at 1650 | 0.43 | 75 |
| FJM32A | 32 | 1760 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 2.0 | -0.9 at 1730 | 0.49 | 77 |
FJM26LS is a lightweight Grade 26 product with a bulk density of only 0.6 g/cm³, approximately 25% lower than standard FJM26. Its thermal conductivity remains 0.21 W/m·K at 400°C, the same listed value as standard FJM26.
This means FJM26LS can reduce furnace-wall weight and structural steel loads without sacrificing the listed insulation performance. Its Al₂O₃ content is 59%, compared with 55% for standard FJM26, providing additional chemical and high-temperature stability.
FJM26LS is suitable for furnaces where lining weight or heat-storage reduction is an important consideration.

The GMK23 Series uses an innovative foamed-slurry casting process. Its principal raw materials include clay, calcium carbonate, and an organic foaming agent.
After high-temperature firing, the brick develops a composite structure containing anorthite (CaO·Al₂O₃·2SiO₂) and mullite (3Al₂O₃·2SiO₂). The organic foaming agent produces a fine, uniform pore structure, giving the brick very low thermal conductivity and good thermal-shock resistance.
| Grade | ASTM Grade | Classification Temperature, °C | Bulk Density, g/cm³ | Cold Crushing Strength, MPa | Flexural Strength, MPa | PLC, % at °C × 24 h | TC at 200°C | TC at 400°C | TC at 800°C | Al₂O₃, % | CaO, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMK23 | 23 | 1260 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | -0.3 at 1230 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 37 | 15 |
| GMK23C | 24 | 1320 | 0.53 | 1.1 | 0.8 | -0.3 at 1290 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 48.5 | 13 |
| Traditional 23 | 23 | 1260 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | -0.3 at 1230 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 42 | — |
Note: Thermal conductivity is measured using the ASTM C182 water-flow plate method. “Traditional 23” represents typical values for a conventional extruded or cast ASTM Grade 23 brick and is included for comparison.

GMK23 is positioned for comparison with JM23-, K23-, and BNZ23-type products from international brands.
Within the same ASTM Grade 23 classification, GMK23 has a listed thermal conductivity approximately 37% lower than the conventional brick shown in the table: 0.12 versus 0.19 W/m·K at 400°C. This difference primarily results from the finer and more uniform microporous structure created by the foamed-slurry casting process.
GMK23 also has a lower bulk density—0.5 g/cm³ compared with 0.6 g/cm³ for the conventional brick—helping reduce furnace-wall weight.
GMK23C is an upgraded version of GMK23. Its Al₂O₃ content increases from 37% to 48.5%, while its classification temperature increases from 1260°C to 1320°C, corresponding to ASTM Grade 24. It is intended for applications requiring a greater temperature margin, including higher-duty electric kilns and laboratory furnace linings.
Selection note: GMK23 has chemical, thermal, and physical properties comparable to JM23- and BNZ23-type products and may be considered as a replacement candidate under suitable operating conditions.
Final material selection depends on the operating temperature, lining position, furnace atmosphere, mechanical load, and heating cycle. Sample testing or a trial installation is recommended before making a final replacement decision.
The EcoFoam RTGC Series uses a foam-cast microporous manufacturing process. Selected alumina, refractory clay, and organic foaming agents produce a fine and uniform microporous structure.
The series covers ASTM Grades 23 to 30, with classification temperatures from 1260°C to 1650°C. At relatively low density, it balances insulation performance, mechanical strength, and high-temperature dimensional stability.
EcoFoam RTGC is positioned as an IFB solution for energy-efficiency upgrades and performance improvements.

| Grade | ASTM Grade | Classification Temperature, °C | Bulk Density, g/cm³ | Cold Crushing Strength, MPa | Flexural Strength, MPa | ASTM PLC, % at °C × 24 h | RUL T0.5, °C | TC at 400°C, YB/T, W/m·K | Al₂O₃, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTGC23 | 23 | 1260 | 0.53 | 1.2 | 0.9 | -0.4 at 1230 | 1150 | 0.13 | 45 |
| RTGC26-06 | 26 | 1400 | 0.60 | 2.5 | 1.2 | -0.5 at 1360 | 1300 | 0.17 | 50 |
| RTGC26 | 26 | 1430 | 0.70 | 3.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 at 1400 | 1320 | 0.19 | 52 |
| RTGC28 | 28 | 1540 | 0.80 | 4.0 | 1.8 | -0.5 at 1510 | 1450 | 0.28 | 63 |
| RTGC30 | 30 | 1650 | 0.95 | 5.0 | 2.2 | -1.0 at 1600 | 1510 | 0.34 | 73 |
According to thermal simulation calculations, replacing conventional extruded insulating firebrick with EcoFoam low-thermal-conductivity IFB may save approximately 51 m³ of natural gas per square metre of furnace wall per year under the simulated conditions.
This corresponds to approximately RMB 2.9 per standard brick per year. Even if the initial brick cost is 50% higher, long-term fuel savings may still provide an attractive return on investment.
Actual energy savings depend on the furnace type, operating temperature, annual operating time, and complete furnace-wall construction.

Regardless of the product series, the following six parameters are central to IFB selection. Understanding their engineering significance helps avoid the common mistake of selecting a brick based only on temperature.
As explained above, classification temperature is the laboratory test temperature at which permanent linear change after reheating does not exceed 2%. It is not the same as a recommended continuous operating temperature.
The selection process should account for the brick’s position in the lining—hot face or backup—and include an appropriate margin above the calculated design or interface temperature.
This is the first selection step: determine the required temperature grade before comparing other properties.
Thermal conductivity directly influences heat loss through the furnace wall and is one of the most important energy-efficiency parameters for insulating firebrick.
Important considerations include:
Bulk density affects three key areas:
Selection therefore requires a balance among insulation performance, mechanical strength, and lining weight.
Cold crushing strength affects transportation, installation, and lining durability. Hot strength influences the range of suitable operating conditions.
The selection principle is to choose sufficient strength for the application rather than automatically pursuing the highest possible strength. Excessive strength often comes with greater density and higher thermal conductivity.
Key considerations include:
Permanent linear change reflects the dimensional stability of a brick during extended high-temperature exposure. It directly affects lining joints and sealing performance.
Important considerations include:
Chemical composition provides a foundation for material performance, but it should not be used as the only criterion for determining whether one brick is better than another.
Key considerations include:

The following table compares the three product series at ASTM Grades 23 and 26, two of the most commonly used classifications.
All listed values are based on the ASTM C182 water-flow plate method to support a more consistent comparison.
| ASTM Grade | Product | Bulk Density, g/cm³ | TC at 200°C, W/m·K | TC at 400°C, W/m·K | TC at 800°C, W/m·K | Cold Crushing Strength, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM 23 | GMK23 | 0.5 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 1.0 |
| RTGC23 | 0.53 | — | 0.13 | 0.17 | 1.2 | |
| FJM23 | 0.6 | — | 0.19 | 0.24 | 1.6 | |
| ASTM 26 | RTGC26-06 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 2.5 |
| RTGC26 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 3.0 | |
| FJM26 | 0.80 | — | 0.21 | 0.30 | 2.5 |
Comparison conclusions:
- Grade 23: GMK23 has the lowest listed thermal conductivity at 400°C—0.12 W/m·K—which is approximately 37% lower than FJM23.
- Grade 26: RTGC26-06 achieves lower listed thermal conductivity at a lower density: 0.17 versus 0.21 W/m·K at 400°C, with densities of 0.60 versus 0.80 g/cm³. Its listed compressive strength is 2.5 versus 2.5 MPa.
- Strength: The FJM Series generally provides higher strength within equivalent grades and is suitable for load-bearing positions.
- Maximum classification temperature: The FJM Series covers grades up to 1760°C, GMK23 up to 1320°C, and EcoFoam RTGC up to 1650°C.
The following selection process is recommended for practical furnace projects:
Ceramic kilns—including roller kilns, tunnel kilns, and shuttle kilns—are among the largest application areas for insulating firebrick.
Roller and tunnel kilns commonly operate between 1200°C and 1450°C and require good dimensional accuracy and high-temperature volume stability.

Glass furnaces operate at high temperatures, commonly between 1500°C and 1600°C. Some areas may also be exposed to alkali vapour attack.
Insulating firebrick is mainly used in applications such as tin-bath roof insulation, crown backup insulation, and bottom insulation layers.
In the iron and steel industry, IFBs are commonly used in hot-blast stove domes, walls and hot-air pipes, as well as in reheating furnaces.
PLC requirements are particularly important in hot-blast stoves.
Aluminium holding furnaces commonly operate between 800°C and 1100°C.
The main considerations are controlling furnace-wall heat loss and ensuring that the insulating firebrick is isolated from direct contact with molten aluminium.
Electric kilns and laboratory furnaces are normally compact, heat rapidly, and operate in cycles. Low heat storage and low heat loss are therefore particularly important.
Petrochemical process heaters, cracking furnaces, and reformers cover a wide operating-temperature range. Some applications involve reducing atmospheres containing H₂ or CO.
Kilns used to calcine lithium-battery cathode and anode materials require controlled atmospheres, good temperature uniformity, and careful contamination management.
Classification temperature is the test temperature at which the permanent linear change of the insulating firebrick after reheating does not exceed 2%.
For example, ASTM Grade 23 corresponds to a test temperature of 1230°C and a classification temperature of 1260°C. This does not mean the brick can necessarily be used continuously at 1260°C.
For hot-face applications, select a grade with a classification temperature approximately 200–300°C above the furnace design temperature. For backup applications, select a grade with a classification temperature approximately 100°C above the calculated interface temperature.
The main differences are their forming processes and performance priorities.
The FJM Series uses extrusion or cast forming and covers the full ASTM Grade 23–32 range, corresponding to classification temperatures from 1260°C to 1760°C. It is a general-purpose product line offering relatively high strength and a complete grade range.
GMK23 uses foamed-slurry casting and has a very low listed thermal conductivity of 0.12 W/m·K at 400°C. It is suitable for energy-sensitive low- and medium-temperature applications between approximately 1260°C and 1320°C.
EcoFoam RTGC uses a foam-cast microporous structure and balances low density, strength, and insulation performance. It covers ASTM Grades 23–30, corresponding to classification temperatures from 1260°C to 1650°C, and is suited to energy-efficiency upgrades requiring balanced performance.
No.
The water-flow plate methods used in ASTM C182 and YB/T 4130 and the parallel hot-wire method used in ISO 8894 normally produce different results. The hot-wire method generally gives higher values.
When comparing thermal conductivity among different suppliers, confirm that the test standards, methods, sample conditions, and mean test temperatures are consistent.
The EcoFoam Series provides both YB/T 4130 data and ASTM C182 data tested by ICAR in France. Use the data set required by your procurement specification.
GMK23 has chemical, thermal, and physical properties comparable to JM23- and BNZ23-type products and may be considered as a replacement candidate under suitable operating conditions.
Its listed thermal conductivity of 0.12 W/m·K at 400°C is lower than the value shown for a conventional JM23-type product.
However, final material selection depends on the operating temperature, lining position, atmosphere, mechanical load, and heating cycle. Sample testing or a trial installation is recommended before making a final replacement decision.
Not necessarily.
Lower density generally means lower thermal conductivity and lower heat storage, which can improve energy efficiency. However, it may also reduce compressive strength and increase permanent linear change.
Selection should consider the lining position, whether the brick is used on the hot face or as backup insulation, the mechanical-load requirements, and the required temperature grade.
Conventional extrusion has difficulty producing bricks with a density below 0.6 g/cm³. For lower-density products, foam-cast GMK23 or EcoFoam grades should be considered.
The correct approach is to balance insulation performance with mechanical strength.
Use the following process:
For example, if the furnace design temperature is 1200°C, ASTM Grade 26, with a classification temperature of 1430°C, should be considered for the hot face instead of ASTM Grade 23, with a classification temperature of 1260°C.
Insulating firebrick selection is not simply a matter of matching one temperature with another. It is a systematic engineering decision that must consider temperature classification, thermal conductivity, bulk density, mechanical strength, permanent linear change, furnace-atmosphere compatibility, and cost-effectiveness.
Firebird’s three product lines can be summarized as follows:
The three series are not competing alternatives. They form a complementary product matrix.
Different products can be used in different parts of the same furnace to create a more effective lining system. For example, FJM26H may be used on the hot face where strength is required, GMK23 may be used as backup insulation to reduce heat transfer, and EcoFoam RTGC26-06 may be used in the kiln car to reduce heat storage.
The Firebird technical team can recommend suitable products based on your furnace type, operating temperature, atmosphere, lining position, and energy-efficiency objectives. Sample testing support is also available.
Contact us for an IFB selection recommendation:
WhatsApp: +853 6826 3845 | Email: service@firebirdref.com | www.firebirdref.com